AI skin analysis for dark skin

Skin tech never saw dark skin. Oyster grew up on it.

Most analysis was trained on lighter skin and quietly fails on deeper tones. Oyster reads every shade with the same precision, and it is measured to prove it.

HyperpigmentationMelasmaDark spotsPost-acne marks+11
Book a Demo

Measured across the full Fitzpatrick range, in 17+ countries

The most accurate skin analysis on deep skin. By a wide margin.

The same selfie, read the same way on Fitzpatrick VI as on Fitzpatrick I, so no customer gets a worse answer because of her shade.

Hyperpigmentation
6.4/ 10 · cheeks
Post-acne marks
5.2/ 10
Skin barrier
7.1/ 10
The Melanin Moat

Trained on the largest melanin-rich dataset in the industry.

Two million real skin images across seven countries, weighted toward deeper tones, so the analysis is just as sharp on the deepest skin as the lightest. That data is the moat, and it grows with every scan.

See the accuracy research
Oyster AI skin analysis result on a deep skin tone
Deep-skin accuracy
98.9%
Full Fitzpatrick range

Measured across every skin type, not just the light end.

Most skin AI reports one overall accuracy number that hides how it does on Fitzpatrick V and VI. Oyster measures accuracy per skin type and holds the deep end to the same bar as the rest.

How accuracy is measured
Oyster · Accuracy by skin type
Oyster accuracy measured across the full Fitzpatrick scale
The right concerns

Built for the concerns that actually show up on deeper skin.

Hyperpigmentation, melasma, post-inflammatory marks and uneven tone are the concerns deeper skin brings to the counter most. Oyster measures each one with a number and a place, so the recommendation fits the skin in front of you.

Read: hyperpigmentation on dark skin
Concerns measured on deeper skin
Hyperpigmentation
6.4/10
cheeks, forehead
Melasma pattern
3.8/10
upper cheeks
Post-acne marks
5.2/10
jawline
Even tone
7.0/10
overall
Open to scrutiny

Measured, published, and open to a second opinion.

Accuracy on deeper skin is a claim you can check, not take on faith. Oyster publishes how the engine performs by skin type and welcomes independent review from the clinicians who see these patients every day.

Read Oyster Studies
Oyster Studies · Accuracy & fairness
Oyster accuracy and fairness study for deep skin tones
Accuracy on deep skin
0

Held to the same standard on Fitzpatrick VI as Fitzpatrick I, and rising with every scan.

Why most skin AI fails on dark skin.

Three gaps that Oyster was built, from the data up, to close.

Gap 01

Skewed training data

Trained mostly on lighter skin, so deeper tones sit outside what the model has seen.

Gap 02

Lighting bias

Exposure and colour tuned for light skin wash out the very signals that matter on deep skin.

Gap 03

Wrong concerns

Blind to hyperpigmentation and post-inflammatory marks, the concerns deeper skin brings most.

What partners see with Oyster.

Questions about accuracy on dark skin.

How accurate is Oyster on dark skin?+
98.9% accurate on deep skin. Oyster reports accuracy by skin type rather than one overall number, and holds Fitzpatrick V and VI to the same standard as lighter tones.
Why do other skin analysis tools struggle on deeper tones?+
Most were trained mostly on lighter skin, with lighting and colour tuned the same way. On deeper skin that hides the signals that matter, like hyperpigmentation and post-acne marks. Oyster was trained on a melanin-rich dataset from the start.
What is Oyster trained on?+
Two million real skin images across seven countries, weighted toward deeper tones. It is the largest melanin-rich dataset in the industry, and it grows with every scan your customers run.
Which concerns does it measure on deeper skin?+
Fifteen in total, including hyperpigmentation, melasma, post-inflammatory marks, uneven tone, dark spots, oiliness, texture and barrier health. Each comes back with a number and a location on the face.
Can I verify the accuracy claims?+
Yes. Oyster publishes how the engine performs by skin type in Oyster Studies and welcomes independent review from clinicians. Accuracy on deep skin is meant to be checked, not taken on faith.
Does it work on any phone?+
Yes. A budget Android reads deep skin as accurately as the newest iPhone. No app for your customer, no hardware for you.
See it on your own customers

Run real scans on real skin, across every shade.

Bring your own products and customers, run the analysis on the deepest tones you serve, and see the accuracy for yourself before you commit to anything.